The curious case of Ward Churchill

I'm going expand upon a post I put on Nancy Nall's site a while back:

I don't know about you guys, but I'm astonished that Ward Churchill got as far as he did.

If you go to his CU page, and look at his vita, you might very well be surprised.

This guy has claimed to be a Cherokee Indian, after all, his "research" is typically in American Indian culture, but he is not an Indian. At least, he is not a Keetoowah Cherokee, as he claims.

One thing that really bothers me about his claims are the references to the four points on which American Indian status may be claimed: 1) through self-reference (what hooey. If I claim to be Tutsi, that don't make it so), 2) through community acceptance (and most of the Keetoowah community do not accept him), 3) through tribe membership (he is as much a Cherokee as Bill Clinton. Of course, Clinton does not claim the status, while Churchill does). Finally, the fourth way is by blood, and Churchill has no more than 1/32nd Native American blood, if any at all.

Second, he was chair of the Department of ethnic studies. Whaddafuck is diat? For people that can't cut it in Anthropology or Sociology? What a politically correct copout. What garbage. What hot air. What an insane excuse for a department. I'm not claiming that what they do is not valid, or that their faculty does not perform good research; rather, I am questioning why this field should not rightfully be in an Anthropology or Sociology department.

Occasionally, this occurs when a professor is so heinous and universally hated by his colleagues, that he cannot gain
tenure in his own department, so he creates his own empire.

Finally, he is a tenured full Professor, and his highest degree is a M.A. in communications. Hello? A full professor?

He doesn't have a Ph.D., or any terminal degree. For those of you not familiar with academe, dis jus' don' happen. Especially at a "well respected" school such as CU Boulder. A full professor? Go figgur. My guess is that he played the "I'm a Cherokee, you have to give me tenure" card.

All that being said, he's an idiot.

The first amendment let's us say things like "W is a lying draft dodger" and "Ken Lay is a great American" and get away with it.

Now, the question becomes "Should CU and the board of regents fire Churchill"? As much as I think the guy is a festering ball of pus on all of academia, I have to say that no, they should not fire him. Simply because the veil of tenure allows him the academic freedom to pursue any thread of research he wishes.

Unless, of course, he is the plagiarist that many say he is.

At that point, all of his posturing becomes moot, because you just can't do that stuff in academe, no matter how much you whine about it.

Threatening tenure, in general, is a very bad thing though. The effects could be disastrous. We could end up with the David Horowitzes of the world running the Universities.

Comments

[Ashley Morris]

Update: Here's a chart detaining Ward's ancestry.

http://media.mnginteractive.com/media/paper36/0213churchillg.gif

[Belstaff Jacken]

the fresh Affordable Guidance subsequently goes on to fight highly regarding neighborhood discussion especially on Belstaff Tasche pricing matters in difficult moments.

[Mulberry Bags]

the fresh Affordable Guidance subsequently goes on to fight highly regarding neighborhood discussion especially on Belstaff Tasche pricing matters in difficult moments.

[seositeden.blogspot.com]

This will not have effect in reality, that is what I believe.

[sex shop]

Oh my god, there's so much helpful info here! The dude is completely just, and there is no skepticism.

[North Face Sale]

Well it was a pleasure to read such a wonderful story.I must say Great story and epic journey.

[Monika make extra money online]

Well!That was interesting to read ;)

[Pamela]

It is sad that It is sad that after the huge media push to discredit him, this story never made it to the meinstraam media. I am happy for him, and hope he keeps pushing for the truth. It is high time the soulless dregs of this society are called out on their blatant disregard of human life.

[Donalda]

Doubt that Churchill ever did press a court-martial charge. By all actucnos he was a good officer.I served six years in the military and never put a man on report, except when the cops had brought him in and I had no choice. This was not coddling, but cold blooded practicality. A resourceful officer is allowed more leeway in "extra instruction" than a captain punishing under Article 15.How would you like to stand watch 4 hours on, 4 hours off for several days? Or stand in front of a mirror for 1/2 hour each day practicing salutes? [after 15 minutes your arm will feel like it is going to fall off] Or ...?Bad conduct marks on his record do not influence a spirited 18 year old kid nearly as much as a miserable few days days - which do not follow him the rest of his career.